ChatGPT as a Pedagogical Assistant: Optimization of Instructional Design, Rubrics, and Personalized Feedback in Basic Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19870776

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Curricular Planning, Formative Assessment, Rubrics, Educational Innovation.

Abstract

This article analyzes the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), specifically the ChatGPT model, as a pedagogical assistance tool in the teaching work of Basic Education. The

theoretical framework is based on the growing administrative burden faced by educators and the need to optimize instructional design processes through disruptive technologies, framed within the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) model. The general objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in creating key educational resources: analytical evaluation rubrics, lesson plans aligned with the national curriculum, and personalized formative feedback. The methodology used was qualitative, descriptive, and action-research based on the analysis of practical cases, prompt engineering, and peer content validation. The results demonstrate that the use of structured instructions reduces the time dedicated to bureaucratic planning tasks by up to 75%, simultaneously raising the precision of assessment instruments. It is concluded that ChatGPT does not replace pedagogical judgment, but acts as a co-designer that mitigates the cognitive fatigue of the teacher, allowing efforts to be focused on classroom mediation and attention to the individual needs of the student body.

14 6

References

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(22), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Fernández Marfil, M., Pérez Gómez, A., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Los modelos de lenguaje predictivo como herramientas docentes en la academia moderna. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (70), 54-81. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.105452

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069

Flores, J., & García, F. (2023). Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4). Comunicar, 74(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 24, e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279

Gimpel, H., Hall, K., Gehrke, S., & Schoch, M. (2023). Unlocking the power of generative AI models and systems such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT for higher education: A guide for students and lecturers. Universidad de Hohenheim.

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2021). The power of feedback revisited. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 345-385. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211004128

Jaramillo Domínguez, D. C., & Tene Pucha, J. E. (2022). Explorando el uso de la tecnología educativa en la Educación Básica. Podium, (41), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.31095/podium.2022.v41.6

López-Regalado, O., Núñez-Rojas, N., López-Gil, O., & Sánchez-Rodríguez, J. (2024). Análisis del uso de la inteligencia artificial en la educación universitaria: una revisión sistemática. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (70), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.106336

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Inteligencia artificial y educación: Guía para las personas a cargo de formular políticas. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385114

Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human-AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527

Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., & Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers' professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125, 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103399

Ocaña-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A., & Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019). Inteligencia artificial y sus implicaciones en la educación superior. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(2), 536-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.274

Perezchica-Vega, J., Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, J., & Román-Méndez, A. (2024). Inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior: usos y opiniones de los profesores. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.24-1.1

Reinoso, M., & Paz, C. (2024). La integración de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para el aprendizaje autónomo en la Educación Básica. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, (35), e12. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.35.e12

Sánchez Vera, M. M. (2024). Reflexiones pedagógicas sobre el uso de ChatGPT en la educación. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37716

Selwyn, N. (2020). ¿Deberían los robots sustituir al profesorado? La IA y el futuro de la educación. Ediciones Morata.

UNESCO. (2024). Generative AI and the future of education. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/generative-ai-and-future-education

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

ChatGPT as a Pedagogical Assistant: Optimization of Instructional Design, Rubrics, and Personalized Feedback in Basic Education. (2026). Educare Journal Ciudad De Jerusalén, 1(N°3), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19870776

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.