Gamification without screens: playful strategies for strengthening learning in classrooms with limited resources.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18446270Keywords:
Analog gamification, Low-resource education, Active methodologies, Motivation, Playful didactics.Abstract
Gamification has established itself as an effective strategy for increasing student motivation and engagement. However, there is a common misconception that its implementation depends exclusively on digital platforms and high-end devices. This article analyzes the feasibility and efficacy of "analog gamification" or "screen-free gamification" in educational contexts with limited technological resources. The theoretical framework integrates game design elements (mechanics, dynamics, and components) applied to tangible, low-cost materials. Through a documentary review and an intervention proposal, strategies such as the use of narratives, physical badge systems, and manual progress boards are explored. The results suggest that analog gamification is not only possible but also fosters social and critical thinking skills that digitalization sometimes neglects. It is concluded that the success of gamification lies in the pedagogical structure and experiential design, rather than in the technological medium used.
References
Anijovich, R., & Cappelletti, G. (2020). La evaluación como oportunidad. Paidós.
Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research.
Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. MindTrek.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Fullerton, T. (2014). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games. CRC Press.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. HICSS.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
Huizinga, J. (1938). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction. Pfeiffer.
Marczewski, A. (2015). Even ninja monkeys like to play: Gamification, game thinking and motivational design.
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better. Penguin Press.
Santos Guerra, M. A. (2014). La evaluación como aprendizaje. Narcea Ediciones.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimaginar nuestros futuros juntos: Un nuevo contrato social para la educación.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design. O'Reilly Media.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Autor Andrés Aaron Encalada Escobar (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en la Revista Educare Ciudad de Jerusalén aceptan los siguientes términos:
Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo.
Las obras se publican bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0), la cual permite a terceros compartir, copiar, distribuir y transmitir el material en cualquier medio o formato, así como adaptar o transformar el contenido, siempre y cuando se reconozca adecuadamente la autoría original y la publicación inicial en esta revista, y no se utilice con fines comerciales.
